• Home
  • About Sungold
  • Scholarly Sungold

Kittywampus

Slightly skewed views on feminism, politics, parenthood, and the occasional kitty.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Disaster Tourism without Even Leaving Home
It’s 3 a.m. and That Little Girl’s Not a Bit Scared »

Prostitution among Iraqi Refugees

March 22, 2008 by Sungold


On the five-year anniversary of the start of this stupid, immoral war, Alternet reported that an estimated 50,000 Iraqi women and girls in Syria have been forced into prostitution because as refugees they had no other means of sustenance. As the shock and snickers fade from the Spitzer affair, this comes as a harsh reminder that many, if not most, prostitutes either have no meaningful choice in entering sex work or “choose” it under tightly constrained circumstances.

According to Alternet’s source on this, The Independent, many of the clients are Saudis seeking pleasures they can’t find at home. A prostitute can earn $60 per evening – equivalent to a month’s pay in a factory. As a refugee, she’d be barred from working legally in a factory anyway. Family members not uncommonly pressure or force women and girls – some as young as 13 – to sell their bodies:

Bassam al-Kadi of Syrian Women Observatory says: “Some have been sexually abused in Iraq, but others are being prostituted by fathers and uncles who bring them here under the pretext of protecting them. They are virgins, and they are brought here like an investment and exploited in a very ugly way.”
(Source: The Independent)

The girls enter the clubs where they work fully covered, as modest as any other devout Muslim, and tart themselves up once inside, sometimes aping Girls Gone Wild moves to entice potential customers.

But the majority of prostituted Iraqis are forced into it not by family but by the threat of starvation, according to a New York Times report published last year. Part of the problem is that a sizable fraction of the 1.2 million Iraqi refuges in Syria have no man in the household; women with no work permit and no work experience thus have no other choice.

UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security requires all branches of the UN to considered the gendered impacts of war. Prostitution and human trafficking are among the biggest of these (along with rape as a weapon of war). But precisely because the scope of the problem is so huge, the UN’s resources are vastly inadequate to addressing the problem. To make things worse, in a number of other war zones UN peacekeepers have themselves become involved in the prostitution trade, as Elisabeth Rehn and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf found in the their 2002 UNIFEM report, “Women, War, Peace.”

Of course, one could also demand accountability from the entity that created the Iraqi refugee crisis in the first place. But that’d first require … regime change.

Photo of Damascus Old Town by Flickr user Richard Messenger, used under a Creative Commons license.

About these ads

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Iraq, sex, war and peace | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on March 22, 2008 at 9:41 pm Smirking Cat

    I would consider safe to say Bush and his gang of idiots not only never considered the impact of the war on women in Iraq, but truly don’t care. Nothing he has done indicates he is terribly concerned with the lives of women here.


  2. on March 23, 2008 at 1:34 am Sungold

    But he said we were doing it for the women! In Iraq and Afghanistan, too!

    Just one more brazen lie.


  3. on March 23, 2008 at 10:57 am SunflowerP

    That’s where I get really uncomfortable with the “just get rid of sex work” ideology – I don’t see enough attention paid to ensuring there are alternatives besides prostitution and starvation.

    Sunflower


  4. on March 24, 2008 at 12:27 am Sungold

    Hi Sunflower! Yeah, I don’t think prohibition works. I mean, so far it’s been a rip-roaring failure. As awful as I think the situation is for these Iraqi women, starving would be worse. (It’s somewhat analogous to the idea that rape is the worst thing that can happen to a woman. No, it’s not; being dead is worse.)


  5. on March 24, 2008 at 5:31 am SunflowerP

    Seems to me the idea that rape is a fate worse than death stems from the patriarchal notion that a woman’s “virtue” is more valuable than her life.

    (I usually avoid talking about “the patriarchy” because I think that the concept, in all its myriad aspects, isn’t all that well described by the term. But in this instance it seems apt.)

    Sunflower


  6. on March 24, 2008 at 12:52 pm Sungold

    Yes, and this idea that your life is worth nothing without your virtue is what feeds the practice of honor killings.

    I think the term “patriarchal” – as an adjective – is often useful and accurate. “Patriarchy” and especially “the patriarchy” tend to flatten out all historial and cultural differences and imply there’s no chance for change over time. Lucky for us, the historical facts bely this. Maybe sometime I’ll write a post on “patriarchy.” I’m amazed at how it seems to have made a comeback through the feminist blogs, at a point when I thought it was moribund.


  7. on March 25, 2008 at 12:20 pm SunflowerP

    I’d really love to read that post!

    I struggle with that terminology; there’s a real thing that folks are attempting to point to, but it’s a problematic way to do it. I haven’t yet figured out another way to do it, but making a distinction between adjectival (and perhaps occasionally adverbal) “patriarchal” and the noun form will help.

    Also, yes, the flattening effects (in all sorts of ways) are my biggest issue with it, but I hadn’t yet framed it that way – so with just a few lines, you’ve advanced my ability to talk about this quite a lot. Thank you!

    I suspect the resurgence of “Teh Ev0l Patriarchy!!” is because the ‘Net, the Web, and the blogosphere provide a way for anyone to present their ideas, whatever point in feminism’s history those views came out of. All in all I think the multiplicity of fora is very positive, but it means many debates we thought were over, will have to be re-debated.

    Sunflower


  8. on March 25, 2008 at 12:20 pm SunflowerP

    I’d really love to read that post!

    I struggle with that terminology; there’s a real thing that folks are attempting to point to, but it’s a problematic way to do it. I haven’t yet figured out another way to do it, but making a distinction between adjectival (and perhaps occasionally adverbal) “patriarchal” and the noun form will help.

    Also, yes, the flattening effects (in all sorts of ways) are my biggest issue with it, but I hadn’t yet framed it that way – so with just a few lines, you’ve advanced my ability to talk about this quite a lot. Thank you!

    I suspect the resurgence of “Teh Ev0l Patriarchy!!” is because the ‘Net, the Web, and the blogosphere provide a way for anyone to present their ideas, whatever point in feminism’s history those views came out of. All in all I think the multiplicity of fora is very positive, but it means many debates we thought were over, will have to be re-debated.

    Sunflower


  9. on March 26, 2008 at 2:30 am Sungold

    Sunflower, I think we’re very much on the same wavelength, up to and including the apparent need to reinvent the (patriarchal?) wheel.

    I’ll keep giving this some thought and see if I can cook up a proper post in response to some of your ideas. Thanks!



Comments are closed.

  • More Kitty!

      Subscribe in a reader

    Subscribe to Kittywampus by Email
  • Grey Kitty

    gkprof Patron cat of Kittywampus (1985-2001)
  • Comments: Please Play Nicely

    I love critical but constructive feedback. I'm happy to entertain opposing arguments. I'm not willing to host mudslinging, ad hominem attacks, disrespect, unkindness, or hate - especially toward other commenters. Obvious trolls, jerks, and spammers will see their comments deleted and future comments blocked.
  • Recent Comments

    Rob F on Anti-Authoritarian Caturd…
    Ryan on Anti-Authoritarian Caturd…
    ballgame on Anti-Authoritarian Caturd…
    hydraargyrum on Anti-Authoritarian Caturd…
    Sungold on Anti-Authoritarian Caturd…
  • My site was nominated for Hottest Mommy Blogger!
  • Categories

  • cats dystopia election 2008 embodied experience ethics feminism gender stereotypes Germany health history hypocrisy kids local news LOLcats lucky me masculinity media medicine parenting politicians reproductive rights sex sexism shame silliness stupidity teaching violence weirdness wingnuts
  • Recent Posts

    • Anti-Authoritarian Caturday
    • Has the War on Women Met Its Waterloo?
    • The Littlest Lobbyists (Oh, Oh, Ohio! Your Abortion Politics Shame Me)
    • SOPA Is Dead. Long Live SOPA!
    • My Christmas Note to Our Pres
  • Twittywampus

    • @SteveBurnsAlive My kid - home sick - just requested Blue's Big Musical. Leo's nearly 10. You're still beloved. (Albeit upside-down.) 3 days ago
    • @TheApostate A reader emailed that she liked my old post on PC & Shakesville (I linked and quoted you) - and she wanted more Apostate! 5 months ago
    • Blog: Anti-Authoritarian Caturday bit.ly/OQnKyl 7 months ago
    • Blog: Has the War on Women Met Its Waterloo? bit.ly/yEiRYg 1 year ago
    • Blog: The Littlest Lobbyists (Oh, Oh, Ohio! Your Abortion Politics Shame Me) bit.ly/yU5YDY 1 year ago
  • Archives

    • September 2012 (1)
    • February 2012 (1)
    • January 2012 (2)
    • December 2011 (4)
    • November 2011 (1)
    • October 2011 (1)
    • September 2011 (5)
    • August 2011 (7)
    • July 2011 (6)
    • June 2011 (2)
    • May 2011 (7)
    • April 2011 (13)
    • March 2011 (8)
    • February 2011 (19)
    • January 2011 (21)
    • December 2010 (17)
    • November 2010 (26)
    • October 2010 (13)
    • September 2010 (11)
    • August 2010 (20)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (18)
    • May 2010 (13)
    • April 2010 (9)
    • March 2010 (23)
    • February 2010 (15)
    • January 2010 (19)
    • December 2009 (27)
    • November 2009 (20)
    • October 2009 (25)
    • September 2009 (30)
    • August 2009 (38)
    • July 2009 (33)
    • June 2009 (30)
    • May 2009 (31)
    • April 2009 (30)
    • March 2009 (32)
    • February 2009 (34)
    • January 2009 (28)
    • December 2008 (34)
    • November 2008 (31)
    • October 2008 (34)
    • September 2008 (43)
    • August 2008 (31)
    • July 2008 (34)
    • June 2008 (30)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (30)
    • March 2008 (31)
    • February 2008 (35)
    • January 2008 (18)
  • Blogroll

    • 922 Cats
    • Alas, a Blog
    • Astarte’s Circus
    • Badtux the Snarky Penguin
    • Blue Gal
    • Blue Milk
    • Bookworm
    • Brilliant at Breakfast
    • Broadsheet
    • Daisy’s Dead Air
    • Dohiyi Mir
    • Echidne
    • Feministe
    • Feministing
    • Fetch Me My Axe
    • Figleaf
    • Firedoglake
    • Flip flopping joy
    • Glenn Greenwald
    • Henry’s Travels
    • Hexpletive
    • Historiann
    • Holly’s Self-Portrait As
    • Hugo Schwyzer
    • Hullaballoo (Digby)
    • Jon Swift
    • Jump off the Bridge
    • Knitting Clio
    • Loserdust
    • Lynn Alexander
    • Mirabile Dictu
    • Mom’s Tinfoil Hat
    • Monkeyfister
    • Mothers for Women's Lib
    • Natalia Antonova
    • No Cookies for Me
    • Noli Irritare Leones
    • Pandagon
    • Pharyngula
    • Plain(s)feminist
    • Professor, What If …?
    • Questioning Transphobia
    • Racialicious
    • RH Reality Check
    • ROTUS
    • Sadly, No!
    • Screed
    • Shakesville
    • Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
    • Sociological Images
    • Sugarmag’s Random Thoughts
    • The American Virgin
    • The Curvature
    • The Feminist Underground
    • The Political Cat
    • The Second Awakening
    • The Smirking Cat
    • The Well-Timed Period
    • Tiger Beatdown
    • Tiny Cat Pants
    • Viva La Feminista
    • Womanist Musings
  • Wherever you go, there you are

    Locations of visitors to this page
  • wordpress stat wordpress stats plugin

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: